Two interpretations of the concept of the “Übermensch” in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-8769.84.4

Abstract

This paper analyzes the controversy surrounding the concept of the Overman (Übermensch) in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy, distinguishing between two main interpretations: one in which the Overman is understood as an ideal separate from man, and another in which he is presented as a higher type of human. The aim of this paper is not to provide a detailed analysis of this concept, but to show its relationship to the idea of man in Nietzsche’s later philosophy. I argue that although “Thus Spoke Zarathustra” gives a central place to the figure of the Overman, rejecting the philosophical category of man, in his later texts Nietzsche introduces the Übermensch as a type of man who remains within the bounds of humanity. I present the contradictory conceptions of the Overman in this work as two strategies: the Overman as a symbolic figure is used to criticize Christian ideals and the type of human being they shape, whereas the concept of a superior type of human being serves as a model for a practical vision of human cultivation.

References

Published

2026-03-24

Issue

Section

MONOGRAPHS

How to Cite

Andrijauskas, J. (2026). Two interpretations of the concept of the “Übermensch” in Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy. Deeds and Days Darbai Ir Dienos, 84, 69-82. https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-8769.84.4