PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE LITHUANIAN VERSION OF ACCEPTANCE OF DISABILITY SCALE - REVISED (ADS-R): PILOT STUDY
The internal consistency reliability and structure-related validity of the Lithuanian version of the Acceptance of Disability Scale – Revised (ADS-R), a 32-item instrument originally developed to assess an individual’s adaptation to disability, was the focus of the research study. The translated instrument was completed by 274 mobility impaired individuals aged from 18 to 80. In this pilot study, it was found that the Lithuanian version of ADS-R had preliminary sufficient internal consistency reliability and structure-related validity similar to those reported by the authors of the original instrument. However, this Lithuanian version still needs further studies with a larger sample and more specific disability representation for exploring the psychometric properties more thoroughly. Nevertheless, in that there are few instruments on adaptation that have already been translated and used with the Lithuanian population, the authors believe that this pilot study is a very important first step in the process of creating a valid and reliable instrument.
Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Kressel, S., Pollard, W. E., Gilson, B. S., & Morris, J. R. (1976). The Sickness Impact Profile: Conceptual Formulation and Methodology for The Development of a Health Status Measure. International Journal of Health Services, 6, 393–415. doi: 10.2190/RHE0-GGH4-410W-LA17
Carl, B. C. (2013). Acceptance of Disability in College Students. Accessed in September, 2018. Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4180.
Chen, R. K., & Crewe, N. M. (2009). Life Satisfaction among People with Progressive Disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 75(2), 50–58.
Chen, R. K., Kotbungkair, W., & Brown, A. D. (2015). A Comparison of Self-Acceptance of Disability between Thai Buddhists and American Christians. Journal of Rehabilitation, 81(1), 52–62.
Chiang, H. H., Lai, N. S., Livneh, H., Yeh, M. L., & Tsai, T. Y. (2013). Validity and Reliability of Chinese Version of Acceptance of Disability Scale-Revised. Tzu Chi Nursing Journal, 12(1), 66–76.
Chiu, S. Y., Livneh, H., Tsao, L. L., & Tsai, T. Y. (2013). Acceptance of Disability and Its Predictors among Stroke Patients in Taiwan. BMC neurology, 13(1), 175–181. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-175
Cekanavičius, V., & Murauskas, G. (2011). Taikomoji regresinė analizė socialiniuose tyrimuose [Applied Regression Analysis in Social Research]. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
Dembo, T., Leviton, G. L., Wright, B. A. (1975). Adjustment to Misfortune: A Problem of Social-Psychological Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 22(1), 1–100.
Derogatis, L. R., & Lopez, M. (1983). Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS & PAIS-SR): Scoring, Procedures and Administration Manual. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research. Disability Statistics: Information, Charts, Graphs and Tables. Accessed in January, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/statistics/
Elliott, T., Kurylo, M., & Rivera, P. (2002). Positive growth following acquired disability. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 687–699). New York: Oxford University Press.
Grist, V. L. (2010). Relationships between Age of Disability Onset, Adaptation to Disability, and Quality of Life among Older Adults with Physical Disabilities. Accessed in July, 2018. Retrieved from: http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-3953
Groomes, D. A. G., Linkowski, D. C. (2007). Examining the Structure of the Revised Acceptance of Disability Scale. Journal of Rehabilitation, 73 (3), 3–9.
Harpur, P. (2012). Embracing the New Disability Rights Paradigm: The Importance of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Disability & Society, 27(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.631794
Keaney, K. C. & Gluekauf, R. L. (1999). Disability and value change. In R. P. Marinelli& A. E. Dell Orto (Eds.). The Psychological and Social Impact of Disability (4th ed., pp. 139–151). New York: Springer Publishing Co.
Lewin, K. (1939). Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Concepts and Methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 868–896. doi: 10.1086/218177
Li, L., & Moore, D. (1998). Acceptance of Disability and Its Correlates. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(1), 13–25. doi: 10.1080/00224549809600349
Lin, C. P., Wang, C. C., Fujikawa, M., Brooks, J., Eastvold-Walton, L., Maxwell, K., & Chan,F. (2013). Psychometric Validation of the Brief Adaptation to Disability Scale-Revised for Persons with Spinal Cord Injury in Taiwan. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 27(3), 223–232. doi: 10.1891/2168-6622.214.171.124
Linkowski, D. C. (1971). A Scale to Measure Acceptance of Disability. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 14(4), 236–244.
Livneh, H., & Antonak, R. F. (1990). Reactions to Disability: An Empirical Investigation of Their Nature and Structure. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 21(4), 13–21.
Livneh, H., & Antonak, R. F. (2005). Psychosocial Adaptation to Chronic Illness and Disability: A Primer for Counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(1),12–20. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00575.x
Lithuanian Ministry of Social Security and Labour. Neįgalumo statistika ir dinamika [Statistics and Dynamics of Disability]. Accessed in April, 2018. Retrieved from: https://socmin.lrv.lt/lt/veiklos-sritys/socialine-integracija/neigaliuju-socialine-integracija/statistika-2
Mallett, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Approaching Disability: Critical Issues and Perspectives. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315765464
Millon, T., Green, C. J., & Meagher, R. B. (1979). The MBHI: A New Inventory for the Psycho-Diagnostician in Medical Settings. Professional Psychology, 10, 529–539. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.10.4.529
Nicholls, E., Lehan, T., Plaza, S. L. O., Deng, X., Romero, J. L. P., Pizarro, J. A. A., & Carlos Arango-Lasprilla, J. (2012). Factors Influencing Acceptance of Disability in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury in Neiva, Colombia, South America. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(13), 1082–1088. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.631684
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the Fit Of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness- Of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
Townend, E., Tinson, D., Kwan, J., & Sharpe, M. (2010). ‘Feeling Sad and Useless’: An Investigation into Personal Acceptance of Disability and Its Association with Depression Following Stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 24(6), 555–564. doi:10.1177/0269215509358934
Vandenberg, R. J. (2006). Introduction: Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Where, Pray Tell, Did They Get This Idea? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 194–220. doi:10.1177/1094428105285506
Van de Vijver, F., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating Tests: Some Practical Guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99.
Wright, B. A. (1960). Physical Disability: A Psychological Approach. New York, NY:Harper & Row.
Wright, B. A. (1983). Physical Disability: A Psychosocial Approach (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Psychology: A Biopsychosocial Approach
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Articles submitted to the journal should be original contributions and should not be under consideration for any other publication at the same time. Authors submitting articles warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
The International Journal of Psychology: A Biopsychosocial Approach applies the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) licence to articles and other works published. Under this Open Access licence, authors agree that anyone can remix, tweak or build upon their articles in whole or part for free for non-comercial purposes using proper citation.
Readers may copy and distribute the material of this Journal in any medium or format, or reuse its content non-commercially as long as the authors of ideas and original source are properly cited. Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. Users may not use the material of this Journal for commercial purposes without notification and agreement of copyright holders.