TEACHERS’ MISCONCEPTIONS AND CURRENT PERFORMANCE IN IMPLEMENTING STUDENT PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN THAILAND
Keywords:Elementary school, misconception, portfolio, Thailand
As a result of the enactment of the National Education Act B.E. 2542 in Thailand, teachers have been encouraged to employ various methods for students’ learning assessment including student portfolio. Student portfolio is a collection of evidence that systematically reflects students’ learning processes and their learning outcomes in various aspects. The purposes of this study were to examine teachers’ misconceptions in implementing student portfolio assessment, and to compare teachers’ current performance in implementing student portfolio assessment between teachers who had attended the training sessions concerning portfolio assessment and those who had not. Four hundred and fifty-four elementary school teachers were randomly sampled to be participants in this study. Questionnaires were employed to collect data on teachers’ misconceptions about the principles of student portfolio assessment and the utilization of the results from student portfolio assessment, as well as their current performance in implementing four main steps of student portfolio assessment [i.e., (a) planning for portfolio assessment, (b) collecting created products, (c) selecting products and reflecting on selected products, and (d) revising and evaluating products]. Results revealed that, overall, teachers had misconceptions in nine concepts. Six concepts were about the principles of student portfolio assessment and three concepts were about the utilization of the results from student portfolio assessment. Performance, which consisted of implementing four main steps of student portfolio assessment, was higher for teachers who had attended the training sessions concerning student portfolio assessment than for those teachers who had not attended the training sessions. The findings of this study could help related public sector personnel and teacher trainers from universities change teachers’ misconceptions more effectively.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Benson, B., & Barnett, S. (1999). Student-Led Conferencing Using Showcase Portfolios. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.
Burke, K., Forgerty, R., & Belgrad S. (1994). The mindful school: The portfolio connection. Palatine, IL: Skylight.
Chappuis, J., Stiggins, R., Chappuis, S., & Arter, J. (2012). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right- Using it well. (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Peason.
Chinnawong, S. (2000). Effects of portfolio assessment on mathematics achievement, achievement motivation and attitude toward mathematics of prathomsuksa four students. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani, Thailand.
Cole, D. J., Ryan, C. W., Kick, F., & Mathies, B. K. (2000). Portfolio across the curriculum and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Educational Technique Department. (1996). Authentic assessment. Bangkok, Thailand: Office of National Education Commission.
Elango, S., Jutti, R. C., & Lee, L. K. (2005). Portfolio as a learning tool: Students’ perspective. Annals Academy of Medicine, 34(8), 511–514.
Epstein, A. (2001). The portfolio process. Retrieved June 4, 2002, from http://www.teachervision.fen.com/lesson-plans/lesson-4537.html
Gencel, I. E. (2016). The effect of portfolio assessments on metacognitive skills and attitudes toward a course. Education Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(1), 293–319.
Kinay, I. (2018). Investigation of prospective teachers’ beliefs towards authentic assessment. World Journal of Education, 8(1), 75–82.
Kingore, B. (1995). Introducing parents to portfolio assessment: A collaborative effort toward authentic assessment. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 18(4), 12–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107621759501800406
Koraneekid, P. (2007). Development of electronic portfolio model using self-assessment to enhance student teachers’ critical thinking. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kornketkamon, D. (2001). A study of problems and opinions of teachers concerning portfolio assessment in basic expansion school in Bureerum province. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Ramkhamhaeng University, Bangkok, Thailand.
McMullan, M. (2006). Students’ perceptions on the use of portfolios in preregistration nursing education: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(3), 333–343.
Moonkum, S. (2000). Portfolio (13th ed.). Bangkok, Thailand: Parppim Publishing.
Morin, A. (1995). Portfolio: An effective tool used by prospective teachers to encourage self-evaluation and improvement. Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Los Angeles, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service).
Mueller, J. (2005). The authentic assessment toolbox enhancing student learning through online faculty development. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,1(1): 1–7.
Nicolaidou, I. (2012). Can process portfolios affect students’ writing self-efficacy? Educational Research, 56, 10-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.08.002
Pasiphol, S; Koraneekij P., & Sotthayakom, P. (2015). Development of electronic portfolio model of reflective feedback through assessment of student learning development under the Office of the Basic Education Commission. Journal of Research Methodology, 28(1), 1–26.
Pearson Education Development Group. (2001). Portfolio assessment. Retrieved January, 6, 2005, from http://www.teachervision.com/lessonplans/;esson-5942.html
Poowipadawat, S. (2001). Child-centered learning and authentic assessment (2nd ed.). Chiangmai, Thailand: Knowledge Press.
Prawarnpruek, K. (1997). Portfolio. Bangkok, Thailand: Office of Private Education Commission.
Punngam, A. (2000). A development of portfolio evaluation process and utilization of portfolio evaluation result: An application of meta-evaluation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Saereerat, C. (1997). Portfolio assessment. Bangkok, Thailand: The master group management.
Saypetch, P. (2003). A study of conditions and problems of authentic assessment by using portfolio according to the opinions of teachers in primary schools under the Office of Buriram Provincial Primary Education. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Buriram Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Siladech, C. (1997). The development of mathayomsuksa 3 English portfolio assessment. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sootthipong, B. (2000). Effects of teaching interior architecture by using portfolios on learning achievement of the first-year student at the higher vocational education certificate level, the Division of Interior Architecture, Rajamangala Institute of technology. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sripijitworasakul, A., & Tangdhanakanond, K. (2012). Development of a checklist for elementary school student portfolio assessment for Thai language subject area. Online Journal of Education, 7(1), 1681–1692.
Srirod, W. (2002). Condition and problems related to using student portfolio assessment under the jurisdiction of the Office of Doi Saket District Primary Education, Chiang Mai Province. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Sujarittanarugse, P. (2005). A proposed web-based instructional model based on constructivist concept using electronic portfolio for creative thinking development of undergraduate students in social sciences, Chulalongkorn University. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tangdhanakanond, K. (2006). Authentic assessment. Journal of Educational Studies, 34(3), 1–13.
Tangdhanakanond, K., Pitiyanuwat, S., & Archwamety, T. (2005). Constructionism: Student learning and development. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(3), 259–266.
Tangdhanakanond, K., Pitiyanuwat, S., & Archwamety, T. (2006a). A development of portfolio for learning assessment of students taught by full – scale constructionism approach at Darunsikkhalai school. Research in the Schools, 13(2), 24–36.
Tangdhanakanond, K., Pitiyanuwat, S., & Archwamety, T. (2006b). Assessment of achievement and personal qualities under constructionist learning environment. Education, 126(3), 495–503.
Tangdhanakanond, K., & Wongwanich, S. (2012). Teacher attitude and needs assessment concerning the use of student portfolio assessment in Thailand’s educational reform process. International Journal of Psychology: A Biopsychosocial Approach, 10, 71–88.
Tangdhanakanond, K., & Wongwanich, S. (2015). State, problems and guidelines for solving problems in implementing student portfolio assessment in elementary school in Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 1381–1387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.257
Tangdhanakanond, K. (2016). Performance Assessment (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Tomkins, M., & Quette-Frenette, D. (2010). Learning portfolio models in health regulatory Colleges of Ontario, Canada. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 30(1), 57–64.
Tyler, D., & Dibble E. (2019). Toward Authentic Assessment: Using ePortfolio at Salt Lake Community College. New Directions for Community Colleges, 186, 37–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cc.20353
Waedramae, M. (2004). Analysis of misconceptions and practices in educational quality assessment. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Articles submitted to the journal should be original contributions and should not be under consideration for any other publication at the same time. Authors submitting articles warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
The International Journal of Psychology: A Biopsychosocial Approach applies the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) licence to articles and other works published. Under this Open Access licence, authors agree that anyone can remix, tweak or build upon their articles in whole or part for free for non-comercial purposes using proper citation.
Readers may copy and distribute the material of this Journal in any medium or format, or reuse its content non-commercially as long as the authors of ideas and original source are properly cited. Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. Users may not use the material of this Journal for commercial purposes without notification and agreement of copyright holders.